← Vehicles
D

Dolphin

Serious concerns
BYD · 🇨🇳 China · Cellular + WiFi + Bluetooth
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
App: BYD App
Manufacturer: BYD

⚠️ The bottom line

A BYD owner in Australia dialled his own car's SIM number and could listen to everything happening inside — conversations, music, arguments. Nothing appeared on screen. He couldn't hang up from the car. Turning off cellular didn't help. Anyone who knew that number could silently listen to your family driving to school. BYD said they'd fix it, which means it was broken the whole time every other owner drove around with an open microphone. Chinese law literally says every company must cooperate with intelligence agencies when asked. BYD is a Chinese company. Two US Senators wrote to BYD in September 2024 and asked point-blank: is the data you collect from vehicles subject to China's spy law? BYD never publicly answered. They can promise Australian drivers anything they like — but Chinese law overrides company policy, and there's no mechanism to refuse a secret request from Beijing.

Legal jurisdiction
🇨🇳 China (headquarters)
National Intelligence Law read more →
Company must secretly hand data to Chinese intelligence on request
Data Security Law read more →
State can classify any data as 'important' and demand access for national security
Spying
4/4 EXTREME
Is someone spying on me?
Data Sharing
4/4 EXTREME
Who gets my data?
Security
1/4 LOW
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
2/4 MODERATE
Can I trust what they say?
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
7Contradictions
2Critical
4High
1Medium
11Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 4/4 EXTREME 4 findings
⚠️ criticalmarketing vs observed
A BYD owner in Australia dialled his own car's SIM number and could listen to everything happening inside — conversations, music, arguments. Nothing appeared on screen. He couldn't hang up from the car. Turning off cellular didn't help. Anyone who knew that number could silently listen to your family driving to school. BYD said they'd fix it, which means it was broken the whole time every other owner drove around with an open microphone.

What they claim: BYD markets its vehicles as safe and secure, with Australian distributor EVDirect stating BYD "treats the protection of customers' personal information with the utmost importance"

What we found: An Australian BYD owner discovered the car's internal SIM card could be dialled by an external party, transmitting audio from inside the vehicle without any indication on the dashboard. The owner could not hang up the covert call from inside the car — not from the phone app, not from the steering wheel button. The eavesdropping persisted even when the car's cellular setting was turned off. BYD later confirmed it was "working on a fix."

⚡ highmarketing vs regulatory
The UK military bans BYD and other Chinese EVs from intelligence sites — staff must park two miles away from spy headquarters because the cars might be collecting intelligence. Military chiefs were told to stop talking in EVs in case they're being recorded. The US banned Chinese connected cars entirely. But in Australia, these same vehicles park in parliamentary garages and school pickup lines. The intelligence agencies of two Five Eyes allies treat these cars as surveillance devices. Australian families are told they're fine.

What they claim: BYD markets its vehicles as safe, connected, and suitable for everyday family use in Western markets including Australia, UK, and Europe

What we found: In April 2025, the UK Ministry of Defence banned EVs with Chinese components from sensitive military sites including RAF Wyton (Five Eyes intelligence hub). Staff must park Chinese-made EVs two miles from key buildings. Military chiefs were ordered to stop having conversations in electric cars over fears they could be recorded and transmitted. In 2023, a Chinese tracking device was found in a UK Government car. The US Commerce Department finalized a rule in January 2025 effectively banning all Chinese-made connected vehicles from the American market citing national security.

⚡ highpolicy vs observed
Hidden in BYD's terms is language straight from Beijing's censorship handbook: they can surveil you for "insulting other countries" or "spreading rumors that disrupt social stability." These are the exact phrases China uses to jail dissidents and silence critics. They're now in the terms of service of a car driven by Australian families. Your vehicle's manufacturer reserves the right to monitor whether you're being sufficiently respectful of China.

What they claim: BYD positions itself as a global company operating under local privacy laws in each market (Australian Privacy Act, EU GDPR)

What we found: The NRMA investigation found BYD's policy reserves the right to surveil "improper activities" defined in a separate agreement, including terms such as "insult other countries or regions" and "spread rumors, disrupt social order, and undermine social stability." These are standard CCP censorship categories transplanted into a car company's terms of service. BYD's global legal notice references "relevant Chinese laws" as the governing standard for prohibited content, even on their international-facing properties.

⚫ mediummarketing vs observed
Mozilla reviewed every major car brand for privacy. Cars are the worst product category they've ever tested — worse than sex toys, worse than smart speakers. Every single brand failed. The connected features BYD advertises (cameras, GPS, always-on internet, voice recognition) are exactly what makes modern cars surveillance machines. They're selling the spy tools as luxury features.

What they claim: BYD markets its connected features — app control, remote monitoring, GPS navigation, voice commands — as convenience and safety features for modern drivers

What we found: Mozilla's Privacy Not Included rated cars as "the worst product category we have ever reviewed for privacy" in September 2023. All 25 car brands failed. 84% collect more data than needed. 76% sell or share personal data. 68% had breaches, hacks, or leaks. 56% share data with government on informal request (no court order needed). None met minimum security standards. The connected features BYD markets as selling points — cameras, GPS, microphones, internet connectivity — are the exact technologies Mozilla identified as enabling mass surveillance of drivers.

Data Sharing 4/4 EXTREME 3 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy vs regulatory
Chinese law literally says every company must cooperate with intelligence agencies when asked. BYD is a Chinese company. Two US Senators wrote to BYD in September 2024 and asked point-blank: is the data you collect from vehicles subject to China's spy law? BYD never publicly answered. They can promise Australian drivers anything they like — but Chinese law overrides company policy, and there's no mechanism to refuse a secret request from Beijing.

What they claim: BYD promises data protection and claims no data transfers to China, marketing itself as privacy-respecting to Australian and European customers

What we found: China's National Intelligence Law (2017) Article 7 states: "All organizations and citizens shall support, assist, and cooperate with national intelligence efforts in accordance with law." Article 14 grants intelligence agencies authority to "demand that concerned organs, organizations, or citizens provide needed support, assistance, and cooperation." BYD is incorporated in China. US Senators Blackburn and Peters wrote directly to BYD in September 2024 demanding to know whether information collected from vehicles is "subject to the People's Republic of China National Intelligence Law." BYD did not publicly respond.

⚡ highpolicy vs observed
BYD's Australian boss says no customer data goes to China. In the same breath, he confirms "diagnostic data" goes back to the manufacturer — which is in Shenzhen, China. What counts as "diagnostic"? Your GPS coordinates, driving patterns, battery usage, charging times. They drew an invisible line between "customer data" and "diagnostic data" that lets them say both things with a straight face. Meanwhile, their privacy policy lets them share with advertisers and AI developers.

What they claim: BYD Australia's distributor EVDirect states BYD "does not transfer any customer data" to its Chinese headquarters and "stores that personal information in Australia, on secure Australian servers"

What we found: EVDirect simultaneously confirmed that "some diagnostic data is shared with the manufacturer for warranty and the improvement of future technology." BYD's manufacturer is headquartered in Shenzhen, China. The NRMA investigation found BYD's privacy policy includes broad terms sharing data with "data sellers, marketers, advertisers and even AI developers." CHOICE Australia flagged BYD among brands where tracking down complete privacy policies was a "wild goose chase."

⚡ highmarketing vs observed
BYD loves mentioning Warren Buffett. What they don't mention: their founder sat in China's legislature for 15 years. A board member is in the CCP's "Thousand Talents" recruitment program. BYD won a military technology award. They share tech with China's missile program. They operate in "military-civil fusion" zones — that's the CCP's official strategy to merge civilian companies with defense. In 2025, government subsidies made up 38% of their profit. This is not a normal car company.

What they claim: BYD presents itself as a private technology company competing on innovation, with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway as its most famous investor — suggesting Western market credibility

What we found: A 2019 Radarlock report found BYD founder Wang Chuanfu held CCP People's Congress posts for 15 years (2000-2015). Board supervisor Zou Fei is an expert of the CCP's "Thousand Talents Program." BYD has R&D in at least three "military-civil fusion enterprise zones." In 2019, BYD received a state award for contributions to military technology. BYD grants the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (missile program) access to technologies and data. BYD received $3.7 billion in Chinese government subsidies 2018-2022, with 38.2% of 2025 profits coming from state subsidies.

Sources