← Streaming
D

Chromecast with Google TV

Tracks everything you watch and feeds it into Google's ad profile. The TV dongle that watches you back.
Serious concerns
Google · 🇺🇸 United States
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
FCC ID: A4RGXCA6
Chipset: Amlogic S905D3G
App: com.google.android.apps.chromecast.app
Manufacturer: Google
Model: Chromecast with Google TV (4K)

⚠️ The bottom line

Google was fined nearly $400 million because it kept tracking people's locations even after they turned location tracking off. The same location system powers your Chromecast. Even now, Google admits it can still figure out where you are through your internet connection even with location turned off. Google was fined $170 million for illegally tracking children on YouTube and using their data to sell ads. The Chromecast uses the same Google account system. Children watching content on Google TV can still have their viewing habits, voice commands, and app usage collected, with only Family Link as a control — the same type of tracking approach that got Google fined on YouTube.

Legal jurisdiction
🇺🇸 United States (headquarters)
CLOUD Act read more →
US govt can demand your data from this company even if stored overseas
FISA §702 / PRISM read more →
NSA collects stored emails, photos, messages without individual warrants
Geofence warrants read more →
Police can demand location data for everyone near a crime scene
Spying
4/4 EXTREME
Is someone spying on me?
Kids at risk
Data Sharing
3/4 HIGH
Who gets my data?
Kids at risk
Security
3/4 HIGH
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
4/4 EXTREME
Can I trust what they say?
Kids at risk
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
10Contradictions
3Critical
5High
2Medium
7Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 4/4 EXTREME 4 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Google was fined $170 million for illegally tracking children on YouTube and using their data to sell ads. The Chromecast uses the same Google account system. Children watching content on Google TV can still have their viewing habits, voice commands, and app usage collected, with only Family Link as a control — the same type of tracking approach that got Google fined on YouTube.

What they claim: Google's privacy policy states it collects data to "provide, maintain, and improve" services and to provide "personalized content." The company's commitment to privacy states: "We are committed to keeping your data private and safe."

What we found: FTC fined Google $170M (2019) for violating COPPA on YouTube by collecting children's data (persistent identifiers, cookies, IP addresses) without parental consent and using it for behavioral advertising, earning ~$50M from the practice. Chromecast with Google TV uses the same Google Account system. Google can collect location, voice, activity data, and app usage from children under 13 via Family Link. No age-gating or children's profile protections exist on the Google TV platform beyond Family Link.

⚠️ criticalfirmware analysis vs regulatory findings
The Chromecast remote has a microphone that Google says only listens when you say "Hey Google." But security researchers found critical flaws that let anyone with brief physical access take full control of the device — including potentially turning on the microphone remotely — while the Chromecast still tells you everything is secure. If you bought a used or refurbished Chromecast, it could already be compromised.

What they claim: Chromecast firmware includes a voice remote with built-in microphone for Google Assistant. Google states: "Google Assistant is designed to wait in standby mode until it detects an activation, like when it hears 'Hey Google.'"

What we found: Three critical CVEs (CVE-2023-48424, CVE-2023-48425, CVE-2023-6181, all CVSS 9.8) allow persistent bootloader-level code execution while the device reports itself as secure. Security researchers noted that with device control, an attacker could remotely activate the voice remote's Bluetooth microphone. The exploit chain requires only brief physical access, enabling supply-chain attacks on used/refurbished devices. The device falsely reports secure status after compromise.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
To use a device that plays TV shows, Google requires an app that can access your phone's camera, microphone, make phone calls, see all your installed apps, and manage your Google accounts. A TV streaming stick doesn't need most of these capabilities.

What they claim: Chromecast is marketed and sold as a streaming dongle — a device for watching TV. Google's product page describes it as a way to "stream entertainment to your TV."

What we found: The Google Home companion app requests CAMERA, RECORD_AUDIO, CALL_PHONE, GET_ACCOUNTS, and MANAGE_ACCOUNTS permissions. A streaming dongle has no camera, and the CALL_PHONE permission allows the app to make phone calls without user interaction. QUERY_ALL_PACKAGES lets the app see every app installed on your phone. These 35 permissions far exceed what is needed to set up and control a TV streaming device.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs firmware analysis
Google describes the data it collects as "performance information" and "crash reports," making it sound like basic maintenance data. In reality, the Chromecast tracks which apps you use, what you watch, what's on your watchlist, which streaming services you subscribe to, and reports all of this back to Google through built-in analytics endpoints.

What they claim: Google's Chromecast privacy page states device sends performance information, usage stats, and crash reports — framing data collection as diagnostic and performance-focused.

What we found: Firmware analysis reveals 10 hardcoded Google endpoints including firebaselogging-pa.googleapis.com (analytics), play.googleapis.com, and accounts.google.com. The device runs a full Android TV OS with Google Play Store, not just a casting receiver. Google collects "apps and domains you cast," watchlist, watch activity, streaming services, app interactions, and all apps installed on the device. This is comprehensive behavioral surveillance, not just diagnostics.

Data Sharing 3/4 HIGH 3 findings
⚡ highpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Google's policy now says it can use data to train its AI systems. Your Chromecast collects what you watch, what you say to Google Assistant, and how you use apps. This data from millions of living rooms could be used to train Google's AI — something most people didn't sign up for when they bought a TV streaming stick.

What they claim: Google's privacy policy states it may "use publicly available information to help train Google's AI models." The policy describes data use for improving services.

What we found: Mozilla's Privacy Not Included review flagged that Google's updated policy allows using data to train AI models like Bard/Gemini. Combined with Google TV's collection of viewing habits, voice queries, and app usage from 150+ million Google TV devices globally, this creates a massive training dataset derived from living room behavior. Users consented to a streaming device, not to contributing their viewing and voice data to AI training.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
Google says it only shares a device ID with apps for copyright protection purposes. But Google also lets advertising partners collect data directly from your device using their own tracking cookies, and admits to collecting data specifically for "advertising or marketing" on TV devices. The actual data sharing is much broader than the simple device ID Google describes.

What they claim: Google describes Chromecast data sharing with third parties as limited to "a unique identifier for your Chromecast device" sent to app operators "for purposes of digital rights management."

What we found: Mozilla's review found Google allows "specific partners to collect information from your browser or device for advertising purposes using their own cookies." The Google Home app includes Google Firebase Analytics tracker. Google's own disclosure admits collecting data for "Advertising or marketing for TV devices only" and sharing with third-party partners. This goes far beyond the DRM identifier described in the casting-specific privacy page.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs firmware analysis
The Google Home app on your phone can see every app you have installed. Meanwhile, your Chromecast reports which apps are on your TV and how you use them. Together, Google knows what apps you use on both your phone and your TV, building a more complete picture of your digital habits than either device alone would reveal.

What they claim: Google Home app requests QUERY_ALL_PACKAGES permission, which allows the app to enumerate every application installed on the user's phone.

What we found: The Chromecast firmware connects to firebaselogging-pa.googleapis.com for analytics and Google collects "app interactions" and "apps installed on your device" from the TV side. Combined with the companion app's ability to see all phone apps, Google gains visibility into application usage across both the user's phone and their TV — two different devices providing a comprehensive view of the user's digital life.

Security 3/4 HIGH 1 finding
⚫ mediumpolicy claims vs firmware analysis
Google automatically updates your Chromecast's software without asking you, which is good for security. But each time the device checks for updates, it also sends information about itself back to Google. You can't turn off these update checks, so the security feature doubles as a way for Google to regularly collect data from your device.

What they claim: Google states that OTA firmware updates maintain device security. The December 2023 security bulletin patched three critical vulnerabilities with anti-rollback protection.

What we found: OTA firmware updates are delivered by Google with no user opt-out — update checks themselves include device telemetry sent to update.googleapis.com. Users cannot choose when or whether to update. While the December 2023 patch fixed critical CVEs, the mandatory update mechanism means Google maintains persistent remote control over the device's software, and every update check is also a data collection event.

Honesty 4/4 EXTREME 2 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Google was fined nearly $400 million because it kept tracking people's locations even after they turned location tracking off. The same location system powers your Chromecast. Even now, Google admits it can still figure out where you are through your internet connection even with location turned off.

What they claim: Google privacy policy states: "You can control Google's collection of crash reports and usage data through a device setting." Google also states location tracking can be turned off in settings.

What we found: FTC/state AG $391.5M settlement (2022) found Google continued tracking users' locations even after they disabled location tracking. Google used dark patterns to pressure users into re-enabling tracking. Google's own support page admits: "When Google TV's Location setting is off and the internet is connected, Google or third parties may still get your general location through your Internet Protocol (IP) address."

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
Google says sharing crash reports and device data is your choice, but the setting is turned on by default. Most people never change default settings, so Google collects this data from nearly everyone while technically calling it optional.

What they claim: Google privacy policy states crash reports and diagnostics collection is optional and controlled through a device setting. Policy says: "Crash reports and diagnostics data collection is optional."

What we found: The Google Home app (required for Chromecast setup) requests RECORD_AUDIO, CAMERA, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, and CALL_PHONE permissions — none of which are needed for a streaming dongle. The diagnostics setting is enabled by default, meaning users must actively opt out rather than opt in, contradicting the spirit of "optional" collection.

What happened to real people
Documented incidents involving Google products and user data.
Jorge Molina jailed 6 days for murder via geofence warrant based on Google Sensorvault location data. Lost job, car, reputation. Charges never filed. [source]
PRISM participant since 2009. NSA collects stored communications. FBI conducts warrantless 'backdoor searches' of American data using names and email addresses. [source]
Google received 180 geofence warrants per week by 2019. Each warrant searches tens of millions of accounts. Supreme Court hearing constitutionality (Chatrie v. United States). [source]
What your data is worth to governments
Google complied with 235,000 government data requests in H1 2024. That's +530% over 10 years. Google has been a confirmed PRISM participant since 2009. Under this programme, the NSA collects stored communications. The company is legally prohibited from telling you. Jurisdiction: US (CLOUD Act, FISA Section 702, Patriot Act).
Documented: Jorge Molina jailed 6 days for murder via geofence warrant based on Google Sensorvault location data. Lost job, car, reputation. Charges never filed.
Documented: PRISM participant since 2009. NSA collects stored communications. FBI conducts warrantless 'backdoor searches' of American data using names and email addresses.
What is PRISM? · What is the CLOUD Act? · Transparency report
Sources