← Routers
D

TP-Link Deco WiFi 7 Mesh

Mesh router that sees all traffic. TP-Link under US national security review.
Serious concerns
TP-Link · 🇨🇳 China · WiFi + Bluetooth
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
FCC ID: 2AXJ4BE65
Chipset: Qualcomm IPQ5322 (Network Pro 620)
App: com.tplink.tpm5
Manufacturer: TP-Link
Model: Deco BE65

⚠️ The bottom line

TP-Link says your data goes to the US, Ireland, and Singapore — but never mentions China. Yet the company is headquartered in Hong Kong, the router hardware is designed and tested in Guangzhou, China, and the US government is considering banning TP-Link over national security concerns about Chinese government ties. The privacy policy is silent about where your data actually originates and who at the parent company can access it. TP-Link presents HomeShield as an optional security subscription you can choose to enable. But the HomeShield code actually runs on your router whether you activate it or not — and it has a critical security hole that lets hackers take over your router through that always-running code. A similar TP-Link router was caught sending over 80,000 requests per day to a security company's servers even when the user never turned that feature on.

Legal jurisdiction
🇨🇳 China (headquarters)
National Intelligence Law read more →
Company must secretly hand data to Chinese intelligence on request
Data Security Law read more →
State can classify any data as 'important' and demand access for national security
Spying
3/4 HIGH
Is someone spying on me?
Kids at risk
Data Sharing
4/4 EXTREME
Who gets my data?
Kids at risk
Security
3/4 HIGH
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
3/4 HIGH
Can I trust what they say?
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
11Contradictions
4Critical
5High
2Medium
6Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 3/4 HIGH 2 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
TP-Link tells you that your family's browsing history stays on your router and is never uploaded to the cloud. But their own HomeShield privacy policy says the opposite — when parental controls are active, your family's DNS queries, web addresses, and network data ARE uploaded to TP-Link's cloud. Your browsing data is also shared with Norton and F-Secure through software embedded in the router.

What they claim: TP-Link Deco privacy policy states parental control browsing history "is only stored on the TP-Link product for you to review and won't be uploaded or stored on TP-Link cloud servers."

What we found: HomeShield privacy policy contradicts this: when Parental Controls are activated, "network traffic data (including DNS/HTTP header/DHCP etc.) is uploaded to TP-Link Cloud to generate daily/weekly/monthly comprehensive reports." Additionally, Antivirus features collect "client application info (IP address, requesting URL, File name, File path)" which is processed by third-party SDKs from NortonLifeLock and F-Secure embedded in the router firmware.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs policy claims
App analysis shows only one tracker in the Deco app, making it look privacy-friendly. But the real tracking happens inside the router itself, which contains hidden software from Norton and F-Secure that monitors your network traffic. The privacy policy also mentions advertising and marketing partners. The app looks clean because the surveillance is built into the hardware.

What they claim: Deco app has only one tracker (Google CrashLytics) according to Exodus Privacy analysis.

What we found: While the app itself contains only CrashLytics, the HomeShield privacy policy reveals that the router firmware contains SDKs from NortonLifeLock Inc. and F-Secure Corporation. The Deco privacy policy additionally discloses use of web analytics services, advertising serving technologies, and third-party marketing service providers. The tracking ecosystem extends beyond what static app analysis can detect because significant data collection occurs at the firmware level.

Data Sharing 4/4 EXTREME 5 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
TP-Link says your data goes to the US, Ireland, and Singapore — but never mentions China. Yet the company is headquartered in Hong Kong, the router hardware is designed and tested in Guangzhou, China, and the US government is considering banning TP-Link over national security concerns about Chinese government ties. The privacy policy is silent about where your data actually originates and who at the parent company can access it.

What they claim: Deco privacy policy states data is transferred to US, Ireland, and Singapore via AWS. Policy does not mention China.

What we found: FCC filing lists applicant as TP-Link Corporation Limited (Hong Kong). Testing performed by UL Verification Services (Guangzhou), China. The V1 hardware uses FCC grantee code 2AXJ4 (TP-Link Corporation Limited, HK). V2 uses 2BCGW (TP-Link Systems Inc., US) — a corporate restructuring specifically to distance US operations from the Chinese parent amid a national security probe. The US Commerce Department has proposed banning TP-Link over ties to the Chinese government.

⚡ highfirmware analysis vs policy claims
TP-Link advertises Wi-Fi 7 with faster 6GHz speeds as a key selling point. What they don't prominently tell you is that using this feature requires your router to report its location to Qualcomm's servers every 24 hours. You're trading location privacy for faster Wi-Fi, and this trade-off is buried in the privacy policy rather than disclosed when you turn on 6GHz.

What they claim: TP-Link Deco BE65 supports Wi-Fi 7 with 6GHz band operation as a headline feature.

What we found: Privacy policy discloses that enabling 6GHz band and AFC function requires transferring nearby WiFi information to Qualcomm AFC server every 24 hours for location determination. This is a regulatory requirement (FCC), but users are not informed at the point of enabling 6GHz that their router will continuously report its location to Qualcomm. The feature is marketed as faster Wi-Fi, not as location tracking.

⚡ highregulatory findings vs firmware analysis
The same router is sold under two different company names — one registered in Hong Kong, the other in the US. TP-Link created the US company specifically because the government was investigating them for national security concerns. The router's software, cloud servers, and engineers are the same regardless of which company name is on the FCC filing.

What they claim: FCC ID 2AXJ4BE65 lists applicant as TP-Link Corporation Limited (Hong Kong). FCC ID 2BCGWBE65V2 lists applicant as TP-Link Systems Inc. (US).

What we found: The same physical product (Deco BE65) is filed under two different corporate entities and FCC grantee codes. The V1 hardware is filed by the Hong Kong entity (2AXJ4), while the V2 hardware is filed by the new US entity (2BCGW). This corporate restructuring occurred specifically in response to the US national security probe. The firmware codebase, cloud infrastructure, and development teams are shared across both versions. The US entity was created to provide legal separation from the Chinese parent company.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
TP-Link says you can opt out of data collection in the app settings. But the tracking happens in two places: the app on your phone AND the router itself. Even if you turn off tracking in the app, the security software built into the router's firmware (from Norton and F-Secure) keeps collecting and analyzing your network traffic independently.

What they claim: Deco privacy policy states users can opt out of data collection via app settings (About > Privacy Settings).

What we found: The Deco app includes Google CrashLytics tracker which sends crash and performance data to Google. The app requests INTERNET and WAKE_LOCK permissions that cannot be revoked without breaking functionality. The HomeShield SDK from NortonLifeLock and F-Secure runs in the router firmware itself, not the app — opting out in the app does not disable data collection happening at the firmware level on the router.

⚡ highfirmware analysis vs regulatory findings
Your home Wi-Fi router constantly phones home to at least 8 different TP-Link servers. If TP-Link's cloud goes down, or if the proposed US ban on TP-Link takes effect, you could lose the ability to manage your own home network. A router should work independently, but this one depends on a company that the US government is considering banning.

What they claim: Deco BE65 connects to multiple TP-Link cloud endpoints including use1-api.tplinkcloud.com, euw1-api.tplinkcloud.com, aps1-api.tplinkcloud.com, homeshield.tp-link.com, and ntp.tp-link.com.

What we found: A mesh router is a fundamental network infrastructure device that should operate independently. The Deco BE65 requires cloud connectivity for management via the Deco app, HomeShield features, firmware updates, and time synchronization. The privacy policy does not disclose the full list of cloud endpoints the router contacts. If TP-Link's cloud services become unavailable — or if the US ban takes effect — users could lose management access to their home network infrastructure.

Security 3/4 HIGH 2 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs firmware analysis
TP-Link presents HomeShield as an optional security subscription you can choose to enable. But the HomeShield code actually runs on your router whether you activate it or not — and it has a critical security hole that lets hackers take over your router through that always-running code. A similar TP-Link router was caught sending over 80,000 requests per day to a security company's servers even when the user never turned that feature on.

What they claim: Deco privacy policy implies data collection is optional and user-controlled. HomeShield features are presented as protective security tools.

What we found: CVE-2024-53375 affects the HomeShield tmp_get_sites function and is exploitable even without HomeShield activation. The vulnerability allows remote code execution via command injection in the OwnerId parameter. This means HomeShield code runs on the device regardless of whether the user has subscribed to or enabled it. Additionally, TP-Link Archer AX3000 was documented sending 80,000+ requests per day to Avira SafeThings servers even when Avira features were not enabled.

⚠️ criticalfirmware analysis vs regulatory findings
TP-Link sells this router as a security product, but it has multiple critical security holes that hackers are actively exploiting. The US government's own cybersecurity agency (CISA) has flagged TP-Link vulnerabilities as actively exploited, and state-sponsored Chinese hackers used compromised TP-Link routers to attack American infrastructure. The government is considering banning TP-Link entirely.

What they claim: TP-Link markets the Deco BE65 as a secure home networking solution. The product page emphasizes "HomeShield" security features.

What we found: Three CVEs affect the Deco firmware lineage: CVE-2025-32107 (OS command injection, CVSS 8.0), CVE-2024-53375 (RCE via HomeShield code, actively exploited, no Deco patch), CVE-2024-21833 (unauthenticated command injection, CVSS 8.8). CISA added TP-Link vulnerabilities to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Microsoft identified compromised TP-Link routers in the Volt Typhoon state-sponsored hacking campaign. The US government proposed banning TP-Link routers over national security concerns.

Honesty 3/4 HIGH 2 findings
⚡ highapp permissions vs regulatory findings
The app for your Wi-Fi router asks for permission to use your phone's camera, know your exact location, read your files, and draw over other apps on your screen. A router app needs none of these things to manage your home network. Once you grant these permissions for initial setup, the app keeps them forever.

What they claim: Deco app (com.tplink.tpm5) requests CAMERA, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, and SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW permissions.

What we found: The Deco BE65 is a mesh Wi-Fi router — a networking device that requires zero camera functionality, no access to phone storage, and no reason to draw over other apps. The FCC filing describes it as a "BE11000 Whole Home Mesh Wi-Fi System." Camera permission is justified by TP-Link for QR code scanning during setup, but remains available after setup. SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW allows the app to draw over other apps. Fine location access enables precise tracking of the user's phone, far beyond what is needed to configure a router.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs firmware analysis
The router app asks for privileged Bluetooth access that lets it scan for and connect to nearby Bluetooth devices without asking you. While Bluetooth is needed for initial setup, the app keeps these permissions permanently and could map every Bluetooth device near your home — phones, headphones, smartwatches, fitness trackers.

What they claim: Deco app requests BLUETOOTH, BLUETOOTH_ADMIN, BLUETOOTH_CONNECT, BLUETOOTH_SCAN, and BLUETOOTH_PRIVILEGED permissions.

What we found: The Deco BE65 uses Bluetooth only during initial mesh setup. However, BLUETOOTH_PRIVILEGED is a system-level permission that goes far beyond normal Bluetooth pairing — it allows the app to pair, connect, and discover devices without user interaction. Combined with ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION (required for BLE scanning on Android), the app can continuously scan for nearby Bluetooth devices even after router setup is complete, building a map of Bluetooth devices in the home.

What happened to real people
Documented incidents involving TP-Link products and user data.
TP-Link routers used as infrastructure in Volt Typhoon — Chinese state-sponsored attacks targeting US critical infrastructure including water, energy, and communications. CISA advisory. [source]
What your data is worth to governments
Jurisdiction: CN (China National Intelligence Law (Article 7: all organisations must support national intelligence work)).
Documented: TP-Link routers used as infrastructure in Volt Typhoon — Chinese state-sponsored attacks targeting US critical infrastructure including water, energy, and communications. CISA advisory.
China National Intelligence Law
Sources