← Wearables
C

Fitbit Sense 2

Notable issues
Google · 🇺🇸 United States · Bluetooth
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
FCC ID: XRAFB521
Chipset: Ambiq Micro Apollo4 Plus
App: com.fitbit.FitbitMobile
Manufacturer: Google (Fitbit)

⚠️ The bottom line

Google promised not to use your health data for ads when it bought Fitbit, but the promise has loopholes. Your location data, device info, and app usage data are NOT protected — Google can still use those for advertising. And Fitbit's own privacy policy says it shares data with advertising partners anyway. Fitbit promised 'nothing changes' after Google bought them. But now Google is forcing everyone to migrate their health data to Google accounts or lose it forever. Your intimate health data — heart rate, sleep patterns, stress levels, menstrual cycles — will be governed by Google's privacy rules, not Fitbit's original promises.

Legal jurisdiction
🇺🇸 United States (headquarters)
CLOUD Act read more →
US govt can demand your data from this company even if stored overseas
FISA §702 / PRISM read more →
NSA collects stored emails, photos, messages without individual warrants
Geofence warrants read more →
Police can demand location data for everyone near a crime scene
Spying
2/4 MODERATE
Is someone spying on me?
Data Sharing
4/4 EXTREME
Who gets my data?
Security
2/4 MODERATE
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
4/4 EXTREME
Can I trust what they say?
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
10Contradictions
2Critical
4High
4Medium
10Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 2/4 MODERATE 2 findings
⚡ highapp permissions vs firmware analysis
The Fitbit app asks for permission to make phone calls, read your text messages, access your contacts, record audio with your microphone, use your camera, and read your calendar. None of these are needed for a fitness tracker to count your steps or monitor your heart rate.

What they claim: The Fitbit Sense 2 is marketed as a health and fitness smartwatch. Its hardware sensors are designed for health monitoring: heart rate, ECG, SpO2, stress (cEDA), skin temperature, and GPS.

What we found: The Fitbit companion app requests 82 permissions including CALL_PHONE, READ_CALL_LOG, SEND_SMS, READ_CONTACTS, RECORD_AUDIO, CAMERA, READ_CALENDAR, WRITE_CALENDAR, and GET_ACCOUNTS. A fitness tracker does not need to make phone calls, read your call history, send text messages, read your contacts, record audio, access your camera, or read your calendar. These permissions grant access to deeply personal data far beyond what health monitoring requires.

⚫ mediumpolicy claims vs firmware analysis
Fitbit says the Sense 2 is a health tracker, but it also handles your contactless payments and knows your exact location. This means Google gets your health data, your location history, AND your spending habits — all from one device on your wrist. That's an incredibly complete picture of your life, owned by an advertising company.

What they claim: Fitbit markets the Sense 2 as an 'Advanced Health and Fitness Smartwatch' focused on stress management, heart health, and sleep tracking.

What we found: The device includes NFC (13.56 MHz) for Fitbit Pay contactless payments, Wi-Fi for firmware updates, and always-on Bluetooth — three wireless radios beyond what health monitoring requires. NFC payment data creates a financial transaction profile. The combination of health data (heart rate, stress, sleep), location data (GPS), and financial data (NFC payments) in a single wrist-worn device creates an unprecedented personal surveillance profile — all flowing to a company whose primary business is advertising.

Data Sharing 4/4 EXTREME 5 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Google promised not to use your health data for ads when it bought Fitbit, but the promise has loopholes. Your location data, device info, and app usage data are NOT protected — Google can still use those for advertising. And Fitbit's own privacy policy says it shares data with advertising partners anyway.

What they claim: Fitbit states health and wellness data will not be used for Google Ads and will be kept in a separate data silo (EU acquisition commitment, December 2020).

What we found: The EU commitment explicitly carves out geolocation data, device identifiers, and non-health usage data from the protected silo — Google can still leverage these for advertising. The ACCC (Australia) rejected the remedies as insufficient and the CMA (UK) expressed reservations. Meanwhile, Fitbit's own privacy policy states the app can share personal information with 'advertising partners for targeted, interest-based advertising across the internet.'

⚡ highpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Google says your Fitbit health data won't be used for ads. But once your data moves to a Google account, Google lets advertising partners collect information from your device using their own tracking cookies. And if you ask Google Assistant about your health data, those voice interactions CAN be used for ads.

What they claim: Google's Fitbit data commitment states Fitbit health data will be kept in a separate silo and not used to inform ad personalization.

What we found: Google explicitly states that the 'text of' Assistant voice interactions (transcripts) from Nest/Google Home devices MAY be used to inform interests for ad personalization. Since Fitbit data is migrating to Google accounts and can interact with Google Assistant, the boundary between 'health data' and 'assistant interaction data' becomes blurred. Mozilla's Privacy Not Included review found Google allows 'specific partners to collect information from your browser or device for advertising purposes using their own cookies.'

⚫ mediumfirmware analysis vs policy claims
The Fitbit Sense 2 collects your heart rate, stress levels, blood oxygen, skin temperature, sleep patterns, and GPS location around the clock — and sends all of it to Google's servers. There is no way to use the device without sending your most intimate health data to the cloud.

What they claim: The Fitbit Sense 2 continuously collects heart rate, stress levels (cEDA), skin temperature, SpO2, sleep stages, and precise GPS location — creating an extraordinarily detailed health profile.

What we found: The device has 8 hardcoded cloud endpoints including client-analytics-events.fitbit.com and mobile-analytics.fitbit.com. All sensor data flows to Fitbit/Google cloud infrastructure. The device cannot function without cloud connectivity — there is no local-only mode. This means Google receives continuous real-time data about your heart rate, stress response, sleep quality, blood oxygen, skin temperature, and exact physical location 24/7.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs regulatory findings
The Fitbit app appears tracker-free because Google doesn't need third-party trackers — it IS the tracker. Google's own analytics servers collect your data directly. Not having third-party trackers in the app doesn't mean you're not being tracked; it just means Google keeps all the data for itself.

What they claim: The Fitbit app requests zero trackers according to Exodus Privacy analysis (version 4.63).

What we found: While Exodus detected no embedded tracker signatures in the Fitbit APK, Mozilla's Privacy Not Included review found that Google allows advertising partners to collect information via cookies, and Google itself has been fined $93 million for deceptive location tracking (2023 settlement). The absence of known third-party tracker SDKs does not mean the absence of tracking — Google's own first-party analytics infrastructure (client-analytics-events.fitbit.com, mobile-analytics.fitbit.com) performs extensive data collection without triggering third-party tracker detection.

⚫ mediumregulatory findings vs policy claims
The EU gave Google 10 years before it can use your Fitbit health data for ads — that clock runs out in 2030. Meanwhile, Google is forcing everyone onto Google accounts and already admits it can use your voice commands about health for advertising. The 'protection' is temporary and full of loopholes.

What they claim: The EU Commission approved the Google-Fitbit acquisition in December 2020 with a 10-year commitment to keep health data separate from ads.

What we found: The forced Google account migration (deadline May 2026) effectively moves all user data under Google's umbrella privacy policy. While the EU commitment technically restricts using 'health and wellness data' for ads, once users are on Google accounts, Google controls the definition of what constitutes 'health' vs 'usage' data. Voice transcripts from Google Assistant interactions about health are already admitted to be usable for ad personalization. The 10-year commitment expires in 2030 — just 4 years away — after which Google faces no restrictions on using Fitbit health data for advertising.

Security 2/4 MODERATE 1 finding
⚡ highfirmware analysis vs regulatory findings
Your Fitbit broadcasts a unique Bluetooth signal that never changes, letting anyone with the right equipment track your movements between locations. Unlike your iPhone, which scrambles this signal regularly, Fitbit never bothered to add this basic privacy protection. On top of that, a security flaw in the Bluetooth chip could let someone nearby crash your device.

What they claim: Fitbit devices use Bluetooth Low Energy for continuous communication with the companion app and for syncing health data.

What we found: Boston University researchers discovered that Fitbit devices transmit BLE advertising packets with constant, non-randomizing addresses — enabling permanent physical tracking of Fitbit wearers. Unlike iOS and Windows devices which rotate BLE addresses, Fitbit broadcasts a fixed identifier at all times. Additionally, CVE-2019-16336 (SweynTooth) demonstrated that the Cypress PSoC BLE stack used in Fitbit smartwatches is vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks from within radio range. Users cannot disable or mitigate the BLE tracking issue.

Honesty 4/4 EXTREME 2 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Fitbit promised 'nothing changes' after Google bought them. But now Google is forcing everyone to migrate their health data to Google accounts or lose it forever. Your intimate health data — heart rate, sleep patterns, stress levels, menstrual cycles — will be governed by Google's privacy rules, not Fitbit's original promises.

What they claim: Fitbit's privacy commitment page states 'For the immediate future, nothing changes' regarding how user data is handled after the Google acquisition.

What we found: Google is forcing all Fitbit users to migrate to Google accounts by May 19, 2026, with data deletion starting July 15, 2026. Once migrated, all Fitbit data — including heart rate, sleep, stress, menstrual tracking, ECG readings — is governed by Google's broader privacy policy, not Fitbit's. This fundamentally changes how data is handled. Many users purchased Fitbit specifically to avoid Google's ecosystem.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
Fitbit says transparency is key, but the app quietly asks for permission to read your most intimate health data AND your phone calls, text messages, and contacts — without clearly explaining why a fitness tracker needs access to your communications.

What they claim: Fitbit's privacy policy states: 'We believe that transparency is the key to any healthy relationship' and positions itself as a trusted health data steward.

What we found: The Fitbit app requests BODY_SENSORS, READ_HEART_RATE, READ_SLEEP, READ_OXYGEN_SATURATION, READ_SKIN_TEMPERATURE, READ_MENSTRUATION, and 20+ other health data permissions — making it one of the most intimate data collection apps available. Yet the app also requests SEND_SMS, CALL_PHONE, READ_CALL_LOG, and READ_CONTACTS, which are unrelated to health monitoring. Despite claiming transparency, the app provides no clear explanation of why a fitness tracker needs phone call and SMS permissions.

What happened to real people
Documented incidents involving Google products and user data.
Jorge Molina jailed 6 days for murder via geofence warrant based on Google Sensorvault location data. Lost job, car, reputation. Charges never filed. [source]
PRISM participant since 2009. NSA collects stored communications. FBI conducts warrantless 'backdoor searches' of American data using names and email addresses. [source]
Google received 180 geofence warrants per week by 2019. Each warrant searches tens of millions of accounts. Supreme Court hearing constitutionality (Chatrie v. United States). [source]
What your data is worth to governments
Google complied with 235,000 government data requests in H1 2024. That's +530% over 10 years. Google has been a confirmed PRISM participant since 2009. Under this programme, the NSA collects stored communications. The company is legally prohibited from telling you. Jurisdiction: US (CLOUD Act, FISA Section 702, Patriot Act).
Documented: Jorge Molina jailed 6 days for murder via geofence warrant based on Google Sensorvault location data. Lost job, car, reputation. Charges never filed.
Documented: PRISM participant since 2009. NSA collects stored communications. FBI conducts warrantless 'backdoor searches' of American data using names and email addresses.
What is PRISM? · What is the CLOUD Act? · Transparency report
Sources