← Wearables
C

Samsung Galaxy Watch 6

Health tracker that feeds Samsung's ad network. Your heart rate data in the same pipeline as your browsing history.
Notable issues
Samsung · 🇰🇷 South Korea · Bluetooth
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
FCC ID: A3LSMR930
Chipset: Samsung Exynos W930
App: com.sec.android.app.shealth
Manufacturer: Samsung
Model: Galaxy Watch 6

⚠️ The bottom line

Samsung claims your biometric data stays on your device and is never sent to Samsung. But their health app has permissions to read your heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, body fat, and blood oxygen — and also has permissions to sync this data to the internet continuously in the background. If the data truly stayed on your device, the app wouldn't need internet access combined with health data read permissions and data sync capabilities. Samsung admits in legal language that sharing your data with advertisers may count as 'selling' your personal information. Independent reviewers at Mozilla rated the Galaxy Watch as a privacy nightmare. Samsung was also caught and sued by the Texas Attorney General for secretly tracking what people watch on their Samsung TVs. This pattern of hidden data selling extends across all Samsung devices including the Galaxy Watch, which collects far more intimate data than a TV — your heart rate, sleep patterns, body composition, and location 24/7.

Legal jurisdiction
🇰🇷 South Korea (headquarters)
PIPA read more →
Strict data protection — fined Google, Meta. But National Intelligence Service has broad surveillance powers
🇺🇸 United States (data storage)
CLOUD Act read more →
US govt can demand your data from this company even if stored overseas
FISA §702 / PRISM read more →
NSA collects stored emails, photos, messages without individual warrants
Geofence warrants read more →
Police can demand location data for everyone near a crime scene
Spying
4/4 EXTREME
Is someone spying on me?
Kids at risk
Data Sharing
3/4 HIGH
Who gets my data?
Security
2/4 MODERATE
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
3/4 HIGH
Can I trust what they say?
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
10Contradictions
2Critical
4High
4Medium
4Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 4/4 EXTREME 5 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs app permissions
Samsung claims your biometric data stays on your device and is never sent to Samsung. But their health app has permissions to read your heart rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, body fat, and blood oxygen — and also has permissions to sync this data to the internet continuously in the background. If the data truly stayed on your device, the app wouldn't need internet access combined with health data read permissions and data sync capabilities.

What they claim: Samsung's privacy policy states: 'This biometric data remains on your device and is not transferred to or accessed or obtained by Samsung. Samsung does not share this biometric data with third parties.'

What we found: Samsung Health app (com.sec.android.app.shealth) requests INTERNET, READ_HEART_RATE, READ_BLOOD_PRESSURE, READ_BLOOD_GLUCOSE, READ_BODY_FAT, READ_OXYGEN_SATURATION, READ_SLEEP, WRITE_SYNC_SETTINGS, and FOREGROUND_SERVICE_DATA_SYNC permissions — enabling continuous cloud synchronization of all biometric health data. The app also requests FOREGROUND_SERVICE_HEALTH for persistent background collection.

⚡ highapp permissions vs firmware analysis
A health watch needs to read your heart rate and step count. It does not need to read your phone contacts, know your phone number, access your camera, record audio, or look through your accounts. Samsung's health app asks for all of these extra permissions, suggesting it's collecting far more personal information than what's needed to show you your daily steps and heart rate.

What they claim: Samsung Health app requests 76 permissions including READ_CONTACTS, READ_PHONE_NUMBERS, READ_PHONE_STATE, CAMERA, RECORD_AUDIO, GET_ACCOUNTS, and AUTHENTICATE_ACCOUNTS — none of which are necessary for a health tracking wearable.

What we found: Galaxy Watch 6 hardware includes: optical heart rate sensor (PPG), ECG sensor, BIA body composition sensor, blood oxygen sensor, skin temperature sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, barometer, and ambient light sensor. The watch's core function is health and fitness monitoring. The companion app's permission scope far exceeds what is needed to read data from these sensors — reading contacts, phone numbers, camera access, and audio recording serve Samsung's broader data collection ecosystem, not health tracking.

⚡ highfirmware analysis vs regulatory findings
The Galaxy Watch 6 with LTE has its own cell phone connection. This means it can send your heart rate, location, sleep data, and activity patterns directly to Samsung and Google servers even if your phone is turned off or left at home. The FCC filing that approved this radio capability just calls it a 'Smart Wearable' without mentioning that it's essentially an always-connected health monitoring device that can report back independently.

What they claim: Galaxy Watch 6 LTE variants (FCC IDs A3LSMR935, A3LSMR945) have independent 4G cellular connectivity, allowing the watch to transmit data directly to Samsung and Google servers even when not connected to a paired phone.

What we found: FCC filing describes device as 'Smart Wearable' certified for 4G LTE cellular bands — does not disclose that the device continuously monitors biometric data and can independently transmit it via cellular without the user's phone being nearby. Mozilla review warns of extensive data collection. The LTE modem means the watch is an independent surveillance device that can phone home 24/7.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs regulatory findings
Samsung's health app can draw over other apps and change your phone's system settings — powers that go far beyond health tracking. Samsung has already been caught with permission-handling bugs that let unauthorized apps access sensitive watch data. When you combine system-level access with a history of security failures and ongoing lawsuits over improper biometric data collection, the risk to your most private health information is significant.

What they claim: Samsung Health requests SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW (draw over other apps), WRITE_SETTINGS (modify system settings), and KNOX_CCM_KEYSTORE / SAMSUNG_KEYSTORE_PERMISSION (access Samsung's security keystore).

What we found: Samsung faces class-action litigation over alleged unlawful collection of biometric data, with Samsung pushing for arbitration to avoid class proceedings. Galaxy Wearable app (prior to v2.2.68) had improper handling of insufficient permissions allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information (CVE-2024-20890). The combination of deep system access permissions and documented access control failures creates a compounding risk for the highly sensitive biometric data collected by the watch.

⚫ mediumregulatory findings vs policy claims
Samsung sells Galaxy Watches that children can wear, and even has Samsung Kids features. But when a child wears this watch, Samsung collects their heart rate, sleep patterns, location, and activity data continuously. Mozilla's privacy experts explicitly warn parents not to create Samsung accounts for their children because Samsung's own policy allows collecting children's health information, location, calls, and messages. A device that monitors a child's biometrics 24/7 should have the strongest privacy protections, not the weakest.

What they claim: Mozilla Privacy Not Included review warns: 'if you have a child please don't create a Samsung account for them.' Samsung's children's policy allows collection of 'video, images, geolocation information, health information, calls and messages.'

What we found: Samsung markets the Galaxy Watch as family-friendly with Samsung Kids features. Samsung's general privacy policy states: 'Unless otherwise specified, the Services are designed for a general audience and are not directed to children.' However, the watch collects continuous biometric data (heart rate, sleep, activity) which would apply to any wearer including children, and Samsung's children's data collection scope includes health information and geolocation.

Data Sharing 3/4 HIGH 4 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs regulatory findings
Samsung admits in legal language that sharing your data with advertisers may count as 'selling' your personal information. Independent reviewers at Mozilla rated the Galaxy Watch as a privacy nightmare. Samsung was also caught and sued by the Texas Attorney General for secretly tracking what people watch on their Samsung TVs. This pattern of hidden data selling extends across all Samsung devices including the Galaxy Watch, which collects far more intimate data than a TV — your heart rate, sleep patterns, body composition, and location 24/7.

What they claim: Samsung's privacy policy states data sharing with advertisers 'may be considered a sale of personal information' under CCPA, and that Samsung may share 'identifiers and online activity' with 'online advertising services' via 'automated technologies and server-to-server connections.'

What we found: Mozilla Privacy Not Included review rated Galaxy Watch 'Privacy Not Included' with users rating it 'Super Creepy.' Mozilla found Samsung explicitly shares data with 'data brokers' and 'online advertising networks' and may sell 'identifiers' and 'online activity' for 'cross-context behavioral advertising purposes.' Samsung faced a Texas AG settlement (March 2026) over undisclosed tracking via ACR in Smart TVs — establishing a pattern of deploying hidden tracking across its device ecosystem.

⚡ highpolicy claims vs app permissions
Samsung says they'll get your consent before collecting health data. But their app is designed to start collecting automatically every time your phone turns on, run continuously in the background, and keep your phone's sensors active at high sampling rates — all without you having to do anything. It also checks what other apps you have installed, which has nothing to do with health tracking.

What they claim: Samsung's Consumer Health Data Privacy Statement describes collecting health data through 'your devices' and 'Samsung Health' and states: 'Where required by applicable law, we will obtain your consent to collect and use your consumer health data.'

What we found: Samsung Health requests RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED (auto-start on device boot), FOREGROUND_SERVICE (persistent background operation), SCHEDULE_EXACT_ALARM, WAKE_LOCK, and HIGH_SAMPLING_RATE_SENSORS — enabling continuous health data collection that begins automatically when the phone starts, without requiring user interaction. Combined with QUERY_ALL_PACKAGES (can inventory all installed apps), this enables Samsung to profile the user's complete app ecosystem alongside their health data.

⚡ highfirmware analysis vs policy claims
When you wear a Samsung Galaxy Watch 6, your health data and usage patterns are sent to two different companies — Samsung and Google — because the watch runs Google's Wear OS software with Samsung's overlay on top. Samsung's privacy policy mentions using Google Analytics but doesn't make it clear that every time you check your heart rate or track a workout, both Samsung and Google are receiving that information. You're effectively being monitored by two tech giants simultaneously.

What they claim: Galaxy Watch 6 runs Wear OS 4 (Google) with Samsung One UI Watch 5.0 overlay. Firmware connects to both samsung-health.com, analytics.samsung.com, config.samsungads.com AND firebaselogging-pa.googleapis.com, app-measurement.com (Google analytics endpoints).

What we found: Samsung's privacy policy mentions Google Analytics, Firebase Analytics, and Adobe Analytics for tracking but does not clearly disclose that the Galaxy Watch sends data to BOTH Samsung AND Google simultaneously. The FCC filing (A3LSMR930) describes the device as a 'Smart Wearable' without disclosing dual data transmission to two separate corporate entities.

⚫ mediumapp permissions vs policy claims
Samsung quietly admits in their privacy statement that they use machine learning algorithms to create health-related profiles about you by combining your watch's health sensor data with other non-health information they collect. So your heart rate data might be combined with your shopping habits, app usage, or browsing history to build inferences about your health that you never explicitly shared — and this combined profile is far more revealing than the raw sensor data alone.

What they claim: Samsung Health requests READ_CARE and FOREGROUND_SERVICE_HEALTH permissions, indicating deep integration with Samsung's health ecosystem. The app also uses OpenTelemetry analytics tracker.

What we found: Samsung's Consumer Health Data Privacy Statement acknowledges collecting 'Any information that we process to associate or identify you with the data described above that we obtain from non-health information (such as proxy, derivative, inferred or emergent data, including algorithms or machine learning).' This means Samsung creates inferred health profiles by combining watch sensor data with other non-health data — going far beyond what users expect from a fitness watch.

Security 2/4 MODERATE 1 finding
⚫ mediumpolicy claims vs firmware analysis
Samsung promises they have safeguards to protect your data and that you can withdraw consent to stop data collection. But security researchers have found vulnerabilities that let unauthorized apps access your watch's health data without you knowing. Samsung's own employees accidentally leaked company data to ChatGPT, and the company has had multiple data breaches. For a device that monitors your heart rate and body composition 24 hours a day, these security failures are especially concerning.

What they claim: Samsung's privacy policy states: 'We have put in place physical and technical safeguards to keep your information from being improperly accessed, or disclosed.' Samsung's health data privacy statement claims consumer rights including the right to 'Withdraw' consent to 'cease the collection, use, and sharing of such consumer health data.'

What we found: CVE-2023-21351 (high severity): Wear OS Framework vulnerability allowing local escalation of privilege without user interaction, potentially accessing health sensor data. CVE-2024-20890 (medium): Improper access control in Galaxy Wearable allows local attackers to access sensitive information. Samsung employees also leaked internal data to ChatGPT in April 2023, plus data breaches in 2022 and 2020. The device's always-on sensors (heart rate, SpO2, skin temperature) make the impact of any access control failure particularly severe.

What happened to real people
Documented incidents involving Samsung products and user data.
Lapsus$ stole 190GB of Samsung source code including biometric unlock algorithms and bootloader source. Potentially compromises security of every Galaxy device. [source]
What your data is worth to governments
Jurisdiction: KR (Korean National Intelligence Service Act).
Documented: Lapsus$ stole 190GB of Samsung source code including biometric unlock algorithms and bootloader source. Potentially compromises security of every Galaxy device.
Sources