← Robotaxi
F

Full Self-Driving / Cybercab Robotaxi

Fail
Tesla · 🇺🇸 United States · WiFi
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
App: Tesla
Manufacturer: Tesla

⚠️ The bottom line

Elon Musk told customers their Teslas could drive themselves — just wait for a software update. He said it every year since 2018. People paid up to $15,000 for "Full Self-Driving." A California judge finally called it what it is: "unambiguously false." Then Musk admitted the hardware in millions of cars wasn't even capable of it. No refunds. No retrofit. Just a quiet name change to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)" and a $99/month subscription for something that still can't drive itself. Tesla says Autopilot is safer than you. NHTSA disagrees — they've escalated a probe covering 3.2 million vehicles to the last step before a forced recall, after finding FSD can't see through sun glare, dust, or fog until the moment of impact. A Florida jury awarded $243 million after a Tesla on Autopilot killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon at an intersection. Tesla said the crash data was gone. A hacker proved it wasn't.

Legal jurisdiction
🇺🇸 United States (headquarters)
CLOUD Act read more →
US govt can demand your data from this company even if stored overseas
FISA §702 / PRISM read more →
NSA collects stored emails, photos, messages without individual warrants
Geofence warrants read more →
Police can demand location data for everyone near a crime scene
Spying
3/4 HIGH
Is someone spying on me?
Data Sharing
0/4 N/A
Who gets my data?
Security
3/4 HIGH
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
3/4 HIGH
Can I trust what they say?
CONFIGURE High-risk areas that can be partially mitigated with settings changes.
5Contradictions
3Critical
2High
0Medium
6Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 3/4 HIGH 3 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs third party research
A 20-year-old woman was killed by a Tesla on Autopilot. Her family asked Tesla for the crash data. Tesla said it was gone — unrecoverable. Then a hacker pulled the data from the car's computer and proved Tesla wrong. The data showed everything: 62 mph, stop sign ignored, Autopilot engaged. The jury awarded $243 million. A federal judge refused to throw it out. Tesla knew the data was there. They said it wasn't.

What they claim: In the Benavides wrongful death case, Tesla told investigators and the victims' families that it could not retrieve the vehicle's crash data.

What we found: A pseudonymous hacker known as "greentheonly," who reverse-engineers Tesla firmware, extracted the full collision snapshot from the car's Autopilot control unit — the data Tesla said was gone. The data showed the car was travelling at 62 mph when it ran a stop sign and killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon. This evidence was instrumental in the jury's $243 million verdict. Judge Beth Bloom denied Tesla's motion to toss the verdict.

⚡ highmarketing claims vs third party research
Tesla's website promises nobody but you knows where you've been. Then a Cybertruck exploded in Las Vegas and Tesla reconstructed the driver's entire five-day road trip across four states within hours — every charging stop, every route. The sheriff thanked Elon Musk personally on camera. Helpful for catching a bomber. But it proved that Tesla knows exactly where every car has been, all the time, despite telling you otherwise.

What they claim: Tesla's website states: "No one but you would have knowledge of your activities, location, or a history of where you've been."

What we found: After the January 1, 2025 Las Vegas Cybertruck explosion, Tesla tracked Matthew Livelsberger's movements across five days and four states — from Denver through Monument, Albuquerque, Flagstaff, and into Las Vegas — using charging station data, onboard telemetry, and software logs. Sheriff Kevin McMahill publicly thanked Elon Musk. David Choffnes, Northeastern University: "It reveals the kind of sweeping surveillance going on."

⚡ highpolicy claims vs privacy policy
Tesla's robotaxi privacy notice says the cabin camera is off by default. Read the fine print: every early access rider is recorded by default — cameras and microphones collecting cabin footage and sound data. The same company whose employees spent three years sharing videos of people naked in their garages now has cameras inside a car with no driver and no steering wheel. "Off by default" applies to future riders who may never arrive. For the ones actually riding today, everything is on.

What they claim: Tesla's Robotaxi Privacy Notice states cabin cameras and microphones are "off by default" and data sharing is opt-in.

What we found: Tesla's own Robotaxi Privacy Notice contains a carve-out: "Early access riders and guests participating in the invite-only early access are subject to additional data collection practices, including default collection of exterior camera analytics, cabin camera analytics, and sound detection data." The first wave of riders — the ones forming impressions and writing reviews — are recorded by default. Given Tesla's track record of employees sharing customer footage, a car with no driver has cameras with no oversight.

Security 3/4 HIGH 1 finding
⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs regulatory findings
Tesla says Autopilot is safer than you. NHTSA disagrees — they've escalated a probe covering 3.2 million vehicles to the last step before a forced recall, after finding FSD can't see through sun glare, dust, or fog until the moment of impact. A Florida jury awarded $243 million after a Tesla on Autopilot killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon at an intersection. Tesla said the crash data was gone. A hacker proved it wasn't.

What they claim: Tesla markets Autopilot and FSD as significantly safer than human driving, publishing quarterly reports claiming lower crash rates with Autopilot engaged.

What we found: NHTSA escalated its FSD investigation in March 2026 to an engineering analysis — the final stage before ordering a recall — covering 3.2 million vehicles and nine incidents including one fatality. Central finding: FSD's degradation detection system "failed to identify common conditions including sun glare, dust, and airborne obstructions until immediately before impact." In August 2025, a Florida jury awarded $243 million ($200M punitive) in Benavides v. Tesla after a Model S on Autopilot killed 20-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon.

Honesty 3/4 HIGH 1 finding
⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs regulatory findings
Elon Musk told customers their Teslas could drive themselves — just wait for a software update. He said it every year since 2018. People paid up to $15,000 for "Full Self-Driving." A California judge finally called it what it is: "unambiguously false." Then Musk admitted the hardware in millions of cars wasn't even capable of it. No refunds. No retrofit. Just a quiet name change to "Full Self-Driving (Supervised)" and a $99/month subscription for something that still can't drive itself.

What they claim: Tesla marketed and sold a product called "Full Self-Driving" for up to $15,000, with Musk repeatedly promising fully autonomous driving "by the end of the year" every year since 2018.

What we found: In December 2025, a California administrative law judge ruled that the name "Full Self-Driving" is "actually, unambiguously false and counterfactual." In August 2025, Judge Rita Lin certified a class action covering FSD purchasers from May 2017 to July 2024. In January 2025, Musk admitted that Hardware 3 — sold in millions of vehicles as "FSD-capable" — actually wasn't good enough and a retrofit would be needed. No retrofit programme exists and no refunds have been offered. Tesla faces up to $14.5 billion in total lawsuit exposure.

Sources