← Robotaxi
F

Waymo One Robotaxi

Fail
Waymo · 🇺🇸 United States · WiFi
PolicyApp PermissionsNetwork TrafficFirmwareRegulatory
Technical details
App: Waymo One
Manufacturer: Waymo LLC (Alphabet)

⚠️ The bottom line

Waymo says its cameras are for checking your seatbelt. Then a researcher found a hidden page in Waymo's own app saying cameras would be used to "tailor ads and offers to your interests." Waymo called it "placeholder text." That is a remarkably specific placeholder. Waymo says it blurs faces to protect your privacy. The LAPD posted unblurred Waymo footage on YouTube. Arizona police have been pulling Waymo footage since 2016. When cops ask for "accurate depiction," the blurring disappears. Waymo won't say how long it keeps the footage, won't say if it's shared with the military, and won't even say how many cameras are inside the car. The 29 cameras outside see 500 metres in every direction — including into people's homes.

Legal jurisdiction
🇺🇸 United States (headquarters)
CLOUD Act read more →
US govt can demand your data from this company even if stored overseas
FISA §702 / PRISM read more →
NSA collects stored emails, photos, messages without individual warrants
Geofence warrants read more →
Police can demand location data for everyone near a crime scene
D
Parent company: Google (Alphabet)
PRISM participant since 2009, CLOUD Act jurisdiction (US), $170M COPPA violation (YouTube Kids) +1 more
4 structural risks · 37 products →
Spying
3/4 HIGH
Is someone spying on me?
Data Sharing
4/4 EXTREME
Who gets my data?
Security
2/4 MODERATE
Is it actually secure?
Honesty
3/4 HIGH
Can I trust what they say?
Kids at risk
REPLACE Extreme risk. Look for alternatives or lock down hard.
7Contradictions
6Critical
1High
0Medium
8Sources
Findings by concern
Spying 3/4 HIGH 2 findings
⚠️ criticalpolicy claims vs third party research
You did not sign up for Waymo. You did not agree to its terms. But if you walk down a street in San Francisco, Phoenix, or Los Angeles, Waymo's 29 cameras are recording you from 500 metres away. That footage goes to Alphabet's servers. When LA residents protested immigration raids, they torched Waymo cars — because they recognised them for what they are: rolling surveillance towers owned by a Google subsidiary. No one asked the 4 million people in these cities if they wanted to be filmed every time they step outside.

What they claim: Waymo says it only collects data necessary for safe driving. It does not proactively share footage with police.

What we found: Every Waymo vehicle has 29 cameras with a 500-metre range, recording continuously as it moves through neighbourhoods. 250,000+ rides per week across San Francisco, Phoenix, and Los Angeles. No pedestrian, cyclist, or bystander consents to being recorded. EFF's Dave Maass warned: "What starts as investigating hit-and-runs could easily expand to tracking protesters or monitoring everyday activities." During the June 2025 LA immigration protests, protesters set fire to at least five Waymo vehicles — partly because they saw them as surveillance infrastructure.

⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs third party research
Waymo says it doesn't use facial recognition. It doesn't need to. It released a public dataset with 12 million labelled objects — including pedestrians tracked with unique IDs across time. Researchers worldwide have published 1,300 papers using this data. The dataset tracks where you walked, when you crossed the street, and how you moved — all labelled and downloadable by anyone. You don't need to recognise a face when you can track a body through time and space.

What they claim: Waymo states: "We do not use facial recognition or other biometric identification technologies to identify individuals."

What we found: Waymo released the Waymo Open Dataset publicly — 1,150 scenes across four cities, 12 million labelled 3D objects including pedestrians with bounding boxes and unique track IDs enabling temporal tracking of individual pedestrians across frames. Over 1,300 academic papers have been published using this data.

Data Sharing 4/4 EXTREME 3 findings
⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs third party research
Waymo says its cameras are for checking your seatbelt. Then a researcher found a hidden page in Waymo's own app saying cameras would be used to "tailor ads and offers to your interests." Waymo called it "placeholder text." That is a remarkably specific placeholder.

What they claim: Waymo states cameras are for safety only — seatbelt checks, cleanliness, lost items. Spokesperson: "machine learning systems are not designed to identify individual people."

What we found: In April 2025, researcher Jane Manchun Wong found an unreleased Waymo privacy page in the production app stating: "Waymo may share data to improve and analyze its functionality and to tailor products, services, ads, and offers to your interests." The page included opt-out toggles for interior camera data used for "training GAI" (generative AI). Waymo dismissed it as "placeholder text."

⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs third party research
Waymo says it blurs faces to protect your privacy. The LAPD posted unblurred Waymo footage on YouTube. Arizona police have been pulling Waymo footage since 2016. When cops ask for "accurate depiction," the blurring disappears. Waymo won't say how long it keeps the footage, won't say if it's shared with the military, and won't even say how many cameras are inside the car. The 29 cameras outside see 500 metres in every direction — including into people's homes.

What they claim: Waymo says it blurs license plates and faces in footage to protect bystander privacy. Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana emphasises "pushing back against unwarranted demands."

What we found: The LAPD published raw Waymo footage marked "Waymo Confidential Commercial Information" on its YouTube page to identify a hit-and-run driver — unblurred. Mesa and Chandler police in Arizona have been using Waymo footage since 2016. At least nine warrants have been served to Waymo in San Francisco and Maricopa County. Waymo declined to tell WIRED how long it retains footage, whether it has shared data with federal law enforcement or the military, or how many cameras are inside its vehicles.

⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs third party research
Waymo publishes transparency reports. But when WIRED asked three simple questions — how many cameras inside the car, how long footage is kept, whether footage has gone to the military — Waymo refused to answer any of them. A company that records every street in San Francisco cannot bring itself to say how long it keeps the recordings. That is not transparency. That is performance.

What they claim: Waymo claims transparency and rider trust as core values. It publishes transparency reports about law enforcement requests.

What we found: Waymo declined to tell WIRED how many cameras are inside its vehicles, how long footage is retained, or whether it has ever turned over footage to federal law enforcement or the military. The company refuses to specify data retention periods for exterior footage that captures millions of bystanders.

Security 2/4 MODERATE 1 finding
⚡ highpolicy claims vs third party research
Waymo promises your ride data stays within Waymo. But Waymo is an Alphabet company that lost $1.2 billion last year. Its leaked app page referenced training "generative AI" — and Alphabet's generative AI is built by Google DeepMind. They have already released a public dataset of pedestrian data captured by Waymo cars. When a company bleeds $1.2 billion a year, policy walls tend to become doors.

What they claim: Waymo's privacy policy states it "will not share personal information we collect through our products and services with other Alphabet companies" beyond providing services to Waymo or with consent.

What we found: Waymo is an Alphabet "other bet" that lost $1.2 billion in 2024. The leaked draft privacy page referenced training "GAI" (generative AI) — Alphabet's generative AI is built by Google DeepMind. The Waymo Open Dataset has already been released publicly with 12 million labelled 3D objects including pedestrians, used in 1,300+ academic papers.

Honesty 3/4 HIGH 1 finding
⚠️ criticalmarketing claims vs regulatory findings
Waymo says its cars crash 80% less than humans. NHTSA investigated after Waymos kept hitting things that don't move — poles, gates, parked cars. Two recalls in two years. One Waymo hit a child. The investigation was closed without penalty, but 22 complaints and two recalls tell a different story than the marketing deck.

What they claim: Waymo cites its own study showing 80% fewer injury crashes and 92% fewer pedestrian crashes than human drivers.

What we found: NHTSA opened investigation PE24016 after 22 complaints including 17 crashes. The probe found collisions with stationary objects — gates, chains, poles, parked vehicles. In May 2024, a Waymo hit a wooden utility pole, prompting a recall of 672 vehicles. In May 2025, another recall of 1,212 vehicles for collisions with roadside barriers. A Waymo struck a child pedestrian, prompting a separate NHTSA investigation.

Latest Risks & Threats
New developments that compound existing privacy concerns. 2 emerging risks.
RISK 6th-gen Ojai driver with enhanced sensor suite ⚠️ Surveillance Announced 2026-05-28
New Ojai model with enhanced low-light detection, snow capability, and upgraded sensor suite. Expanded environmental sensing means more granular data capture of surroundings, pedestrians, and passengers.
Sources
RISK Waymo targets 1 million weekly rides as Uber partnership frays — surveillance footprint expands ⚠️ Autonomous Vehicles Announced 2026-05-15
Waymo is scaling from 400,000 to 1 million paid rides per week by end of 2026, expanding to 20+ markets including London and Tokyo. Uber — its exclusive partner in Austin and Atlanta — is now publicly attacking Waymo's model and deploying competing robotaxi fleets in Waymo's home market of San Francisco. As Waymo grows, each new city means millions more bystanders recorded by its 29-camera-per-vehicle fleet with no consent and undisclosed retention policies. The partnership fracture leaves riders in Austin and Atlanta in an ambiguous data position: Uber holds their booking data, Waymo holds their in-vehicle footage, and neither company has published a joint data governance policy.
Sources
Sources