Ring says your indoor camera has encryption, but it's turned off by default. If you turn it on, many important features stop working — like being able to tell the difference between a person and a pet, sharing video with family members, or viewing your camera on an Echo Show. Most people will never turn it on, which means Amazon can access your home video on their servers.
critical
Ring says police can't directly access your camera footage. But Amazon has already handed over indoor camera recordings to police without asking homeowners at least 11 times. They promised to stop, then quietly started sharing video again through different companies. Your bedroom camera footage could be shared with police without you ever knowing.
critical
Ring says it keeps your video safe, but the US government found that Ring employees and contractors could watch anyone's camera feeds — including bedroom and bathroom cameras. One worker secretly watched thousands of videos of women for months. Ring was fined $5.8 million. The Indoor Cam sits inside your home, exactly where this abuse happened.
Ring says police need a warrant or subpoena to get your videos, but Amazon admitted it gave police your doorbell footage at least 11 times in one year without asking you or requiring any court order — they just decided it was an 'emergency'.
critical
Ring tells you that you control who sees your videos. But the FTC found Ring's own employees and contractors were secretly watching customers' bedroom and bathroom cameras for months — one employee spied on at least 81 women. You had zero control over this.
critical
Ring says privacy and security are 'built in' from day one. The FTC found the opposite: Ring used your videos to train AI without asking, had no real security controls, and let employees watch your cameras freely. The government ordered them to fix their security for the next 20 years.
Ring promised "strict policies" on who could see your cameras. The FTC found the truth: employees and contractors in Ukraine and the Philippines had unrestricted access to every customer's video feed. One employee watched a woman through her bedroom camera for months. Contractors downloaded and shared private footage. There were no access controls. No audit logs. No limits at all. For years, anyone with a Ring employee login could watch anyone in any room of their home. The FTC fined Ring $5.8 million -- roughly 58 cents per device sold. The company that sells security cameras couldn't secure them from its own staff.
critical
Ring told customers they were "in control" of their footage. In July 2022, Amazon admitted to Senator Ed Markey that Ring had handed police video from customers' doorbells without a warrant or the owner's consent -- at least 11 times that year. Over 2,000 police departments had partnerships with Ring. Officers could request footage from any doorbell in a neighborhood. Amazon denied warrantless sharing until Senator Markey pressed them under oath. Senator Markey called it "a surveillance network that threatens civil liberties." You bought a doorbell camera to watch your porch. The police were watching through it too -- and nobody asked your permission.
critical
Ashley LeMay put a Ring camera in her 8-year-old daughter Alyssa's bedroom in DeSoto County, Mississippi. Four days later, a stranger's voice came through the speaker: "I'm Santa Claus, I'm your best friend." A hacker had taken over the camera. That same week, families across Tennessee, Florida, and Georgia reported strangers speaking to them through their Ring cameras. Ring had no mandatory two-factor authentication. Their response: blame the customers for using weak passwords. The family bought a security camera to protect their child. Instead, it put a stranger in her bedroom. Ring sold "peace of mind." The LeMay family got the opposite.
Amazon gave your Ring footage to police without asking you. At least 11 times in 2022 alone -- no warrant, no consent, no notification. Two thousand police departments partner with Ring. Cops can request footage from any Ring camera in a neighbourhood through the app. Senator Markey's investigation found Ring had "no policies to prohibit police from keeping video data forever." The EFF calls it "the largest civilian surveillance network in US history." You bought a doorbell camera. Amazon built a police surveillance network out of it. You're the customer, the camera operator, and the unwitting surveillance infrastructure. Eleven times without asking. Two thousand police departments with access. Your doorbell is a police camera you bought, installed, and pay monthly for.
high
Ring Neighbors sends you an alert: "Suspicious activity in your area." You feel unsafe. You buy another Ring camera. That camera captures a delivery worker. Someone posts the footage: "Suspicious person." The delivery worker is Black. Research shows crime alert apps increase fear more than crime actually justifies. Studies of Neighbors content found disproportionate targeting of Black people, brown people, and delivery workers. The app creates fear. Fear sells cameras. Cameras capture people. People get profiled. The cycle feeds itself. Ring Neighbors doesn't reduce crime. It sells the feeling of crime to people who buy cameras in response. Amazon profits from every turn of the anxiety wheel: the fear, the camera, the subscription, and the footage it gives to police.